Blog
Deep dives, frameworks, and playbooks from the Dynaprice team on investment recovery, marketplace distribution, and AI‑driven decision intelligence.
Learn why surplus capital assets historically escaped governance and how SCALM is emerging to transform them into governed capital using AI‑driven, execution‑anchored decision intelligence.
In an AI-enabled organization, management is not the constraint. Governance is. Learn why strategy is shifting from execution to decision rules.
Most enterprises stumble into SCALM when 'sufficient' becomes expensive. Discover how to turn surplus from operational residue into governed capital.
Idle isn't neutral—it's a financial state with operational causes. A working-capital deep dive on decision latency, governance, and metrics.
Surplus capital assets don't fail because they lack value—they fail because they lack ownership. A decision‑rights view of surplus governance.
A CFO-oriented brief on surplus governance: combat decision latency, preserve value, and manage surplus as a governed capital portfolio.
M&A combines businesses on paper, but inventories in practice. A post‑deal discipline for governing surplus capital assets.
Enterprise AI is not a user interface. It is a decision layer. Most public attention has settled on conversational tools because they are visible. Enterprises do not win by visibility. They win by changing how decisions are made at scale.
Depreciation is an accounting method, not a value method. In surplus environments, time does not reduce value smoothly—it changes the probability of outcomes.
Fair market value is a price concept. Surplus assets are an outcome problem. The difference matters because surplus does not fail at pricing. It fails at decisions.
Enterprises often talk about execution as if it is a place. Execution is not a destination. It is the system that determines how decisions become outcomes.
AI can scale decisions. It cannot validate them. Validation comes from outcomes. In enterprise environments, the most common failure is not that a model is inaccurate. It is that the model is unaccountable.
A SCALM-enabled organization does not "handle surplus." It governs it. That difference is visible in daily work.
SCALM maturity is not a technology journey. It is a decision maturity journey. Enterprises move through predictable stages as surplus becomes too material to ignore.
SCALM fails in predictable ways. Not because the discipline is unclear. Because enterprises try to treat governance as a project.
Enterprises manage lifecycles. They do not always manage capital. That difference is why surplus exists as a persistent blind spot.
Decision intelligence is not prediction. It is governed decision support. Many systems produce recommendations. Few systems remain accountable to outcomes.
Enterprises confuse surplus with inventory because both sit in storage. That is a surface similarity. Inventory is a planned operating asset. Surplus capital assets are displaced capital.
Software solves tasks. SCALM defines a discipline. The distinction is not branding. It is scope.
Infrastructure is not a feature set. Infrastructure is what other systems depend on. It is durable, composable, and designed for reuse.